legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Alex S.
Father appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his son, (Welf. and Inst. Code, S 366.26.) Father contends there is insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's finding that the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C.S 1901 et seq.) (ICWA) did not apply to the proceedings, because the record does not contain copies of any notices or certified mail return receipts showing that the Department of Public Social Services (the Department) complied with the notice requirements of the ICWA. (25 U.S.C. S 1912(a).) On this basis, Father requests that court reverse the order terminating parental rights and remand the matter "for proper notice under the ICWA and a new jurisdictional hearing. (Italics added.)
Court reverse the judgment and order terminating parental rights, and remand the matter for further proceedings in accordance with Jonathon S. Court do not order a new jurisdictional hearing, nor do we reverse any orders other than the order terminating parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale