P. v. Nava CA6
Defendant Roberto Nava appeals from the stipulated judgment entered following his no-contest pleas. His appointed counsel filed a brief that states the case and the facts but raises no arguable issues, citing People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). We notified Nava of his right to submit written argument of his own behalf, and he has not done so. In our independent review of the record on appeal, we find no arguable issues.
The prosecution charged Nava in the operative first amended felony complaint with violations of Penal Code section 289, subdivision (a)(1)(A) (count 1); section 243.5, subdivision (e)(1) (count 2); section 264, subdivision (C)(2) (counts 3 and 4); section 289, subdivision (a)(1)(C) (counts 5 and 6).
On October 29, 2020, with Nava’s assent and waiver of arraignment, the trial court granted the prosecution’s oral motion to amend count 1 of the first amended complaint to correct the identification of the victim as Jane Doe 1.
Comments on P. v. Nava CA6