legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.H. CA1/2
In these dependency proceedings, R.T. (Mother) appeals from six-month review orders in which the juvenile court terminated jurisdiction as to her two younger children, S.T. and K.T., custody of whom was awarded to their father, and continued reunification services with respect to her two older children, M.H. and E.H., who remained in out-of-home placements. Mother appeals from these orders solely to preserve the challenges she raised in her previous appeal (A161819) from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders and the appointment of a guardian ad litem for Mother. After Mother filed her notices of appeal in this matter, we issued our opinion affirming the previous orders. (In re M.H. (Nov. 19, 2021, A161819) [nonpub. opn.] 2021 WL 5409869 (M.H.).) Because our opinion has been certified as final, and because Mother raises no other challenge to the orders at issue in the appeal now before us, we shall affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale