Dominguez v. Sanchez CA2/2
Salina Sanchez (appellant) appeals from an order denying her petition for a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against Edward Dominguez (respondent). Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence a recording made on respondent’s cell phone. Appellant argues that no substantial evidence supports the trial court’s factual determination that the recording was not surreptitious, and the trial court was required to make an additional determination that appellant affirmatively consented to the recording. Appellant further argues that the admission of the recording constituted a miscarriage of justice, and the trial court applied the wrong legal standard in denying her petition for a DVRO.
We find substantial evidence in the record that supports the trial court’s decision on the factual issue of appellant’s knowledge of the recording.
Comments on Dominguez v. Sanchez CA2/2