In re C.A. CA2/3
M.W. (mother) challenges orders of the juvenile court denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition and terminating her parental rights as to her daughter C. Mother contends the juvenile court erred by denying her section 388 petition because she demonstrated changed circumstances and continuing her reunification services was in C.’s best interests. Mother also contends the juvenile court erred by terminating her parental rights because the beneficial parental relationship exception (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) applied. We find no abuse of discretion, and thus we will affirm.
Comments on In re C.A. CA2/3