legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Gabriel G. CA5
Samantha A. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order summarily denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition. Mother’s son, Gabriel G., has been the subject of a juvenile dependency case since 2011 when he was 10 months old. At the permanency planning hearing (§ 366.26), the juvenile court ordered a permanent plan of legal guardianship with his paternal grandparents. In 2021, mother petitioned the court to terminate the legal guardianship, alleging that circumstances had changed in that mother had moved out of state and the proposed order was in Gabriel’s best interests because she wanted to transition him to living in her care full time. We affirm the juvenile court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale