legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P.v . Diblasi
A jury convicted defendant of robbery (Pen. Code, S 211) and second degree burglary (S 459). The jury also found true that defendant had a previous felony conviction in 1977, within the meaning of sections 667, subdivisions (c) and (e)(1) and 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1). The court sentenced defendant to a total term of imprisonment of 10 years, which was composed of the upper term of five years in state prison on the robbery conviction, doubled to 10 years under the "Three Strikes" law. The court also imposed the upper term of three years on the burglary conviction, but stayed it pursuant to section 654.
On appeal, defendant contends that: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the finding that he was the named person in the court documents presented as proof of his previous conviction; and 2) the court erred in imposing the upper terms, pursuant to Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 (Blakely). Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale