P. v. Cole CA2/7
Rodrick Cole appeals from the superior court’s order summarily denying his petition for writ of mandate directed to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), challenging as illegal his 2008 sentence for assault with a firearm with prior serious felony and firearm-use enhancements, and the CDCR’s classification of his offenses as violent within the meaning of Proposition 57. No arguable issues were identified by Cole’s appointed appellate counsel after his review of the record. We also have identified no arguable issues after our own independent review of the record and analysis of the contentions presented by Cole in a supplemental brief. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Cole CA2/7