Faro v. Garnero CA3
After appellants Steven and Beverly Faro (Buyers) purchased a home from respondent Robert Garnero (Seller), a dispute arose regarding Seller’s disclosures to Buyers. An arbitrator ruled for Seller, and awarded attorney fees to him as the prevailing party in the arbitration. The trial court granted Seller’s petition to confirm the arbitration awards. On appeal, Buyers argue the arbitrator exceeded his powers by: (1) violating their statutory rights; (2) acting in a manner not authorized by the parties’ residential purchase agreement (Agreement); (3) deciding an issue not submitted to arbitration; and (4) remaking the Agreement.
We affirm, and deny Seller’s motion for sanctions on appeal.
Comments on Faro v. Garnero CA3