legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.K. CA1/4
N.M. (mother) appeals from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights as to her son, A.K. (the minor), at a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. After the juvenile court entered its order, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in In re Caden C. (2021) 11 Cal.5th 614 (Caden C.), in which it clarified the relevant considerations for the beneficial relationship exception (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) to the presumption favoring termination of parental rights of an adoptable child and placement of a child for adoption. Mother now argues the juvenile court’s finding that the beneficial relationship exception did not apply is inconsistent with Caden C.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale