legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Ze.G. CA4/2
R.B. (mother) purports to appeal from a juvenile court order denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, in which she requested the court to reinstate her family reunification services and authorize unsupervised visitation with her children, Zy.G., Ze.G., and Zo.G. (the children). The children’s father, L.G. (father), filed a letter brief joining in mother’s brief. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review the order denying mother’s petition, since the notice of appeal she filed expressly stated she was appealing only from the order terminating her parental rights. Furthermore, because mother presents no reasoned argument why the court erred by terminating her parental rights, we conclude she has waived her challenge to that order. Therefore, we must affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale