Hashtroudi v. Haj-Azimi CA4/3
This case arises from an action brought by Alexander J. Hashtroudi against David Hamid Saber and Caltrop Corporation (Caltrop). This appeal concerns the trial court’s orders regarding Hashtroudi’s attempts to bring third parties Lili Haj-Azimi and Nagmeh Reshad (collectively referred to as Respondents) into the case as Doe defendants. The court did not err by granting the motion to quash service of documents (motion to quash) in favor of Respondents and subsequently striking the Doe amendments.
Comments on Hashtroudi v. Haj-Azimi CA4/3