P. v. Espinoza
Appellants argue that evidence is insufficient to support one of the robbery convictions against them and insufficient to support true findings on firearm and gang allegations. They also argue that a photographic lineup was impermissibly suggestive and violated their due process rights. Finally, defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing amendment of the information. Court affirm the judgments.
Comments on P. v. Espinoza