Hajj v. Zahabian CA4/3
This appeal arises from the judgment entered in favor of defendant attorney, Sharona Zahabian, after the trial court sustained her demurrer against plaintiff Ahmad Hajj’s complaint alleging conversion. In an earlier litigation, Zahabian had, on behalf of her client, levied upon a default judgment against Hajj. Although the judgment was subsequently vacated and the money ordered returned, Hajj now alleges that the money has still not been returned.
We review the demurrer ruling de novo and conclude Hajj has sufficiently stated a claim against Zahabian. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter for further proceedings.
Comments on Hajj v. Zahabian CA4/3