P. v. Ray CA1/5
Appellant Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. (appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for modification of restitution. Appellant’s counsel has raised no issue on appeal and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We conclude appellant is not entitled to Wende review of the postconviction order. Appellant also filed a supplemental brief. We reject the contentions in the supplemental brief and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ray CA1/5