In re Ayla M.
Mother and Father appeal from the juvenile court's order terminating their parental rights and ordering adoption as the permanent plan for the four children involved in this appeal. Mother and Father both argue that the juvenile court erred in finding that the "sibling relationship exception" set out in Welfare and Institutions code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(e), did not apply and, therefore, did not preclude the termination of their parental rights. Mother further contends that the juvenile court erred because it did not take into account the wishes of the oldest child, pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B). Court disagree and affirm the order.
Comments on In re Ayla M.