McGranahan v. Bedford CA2/2
Randy J. Bedford (appellant) appeals from an order denying his request for a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against his former wife, Samantha R. McGranahan (respondent). Appellant appears to primarily object to the trial court’s evidentiary decisions. Without providing any citations to the law of evidence, appellant argues that the trial court erred in refusing to consider the evidence he offered. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit exhibits that were incomplete or were hearsay. Further, the court did not err in declining to consider allegations that were made in another court and previously ruled upon. Appellant has also failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his request for a DVRO. We affirm the order.
Comments on McGranahan v. Bedford CA2/2