P. v. Baranovych CA3
Defendant Vladislav Leonidov Baranovych appeals his conviction for felony grand theft. He claims that the trial court erred in allowing evidence of prior burglarious acts to be considered by the jury, and then by confusing the jury with improper instructions. He claims that his conviction cannot stand, as the jury likely convicted him based on a desire to punish him for his prior acts. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Baranovych CA3