M.M. v. S.T. CA3
Defendant S. T. appeals a civil harassment restraining order issued against her pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6. The order prohibits defendant from harassing or contacting plaintiff M. M. Defendant appears to argue: (1) there was insufficient evidence to establish the necessary elements under section 527.6; and (2) the trial court erred in not allowing defendant to present evidence during the hearing and failing to consider the evidence submitted prior to the hearing. Because the record on appeal does not include plaintiff’s request for a restraining order, the exhibits in support of the request, a reporter’s transcript or settled statement of the restraining order hearing, or a minute order of the hearing, we are unable to evaluate defendant’s claims and must presume the trial court’s findings are correct. Therefore, we affirm.
Comments on M.M. v. S.T. CA3