legal news


Register | Forgot Password

de Tesak v. Superior Court CA4/1
Claudia Elena Tesak de Rushin (Claudia) filed this action to dissolve her marriage to Darren Rushin (Darren) in 2018. In January 2020, while Claudia’s mother, Ildiko Juhasz de Tesak (Ildiko), was visiting California, Darren personally served Ildiko with a subpoena directing her to appear at a deposition. After Ildiko failed to appear, Darren filed a request for an order to compel Ildiko’s appearance at a deposition.
Claudia and Ildiko filed separate oppositions to Darren’s request. In her opposition, Claudia argued that the trial court lacked subpoena jurisdiction over Ildiko. Specifically, Claudia argued that Ildiko was not a resident of California, as is required for a subpoena to be enforceable under Code of Civil Procedure section 1989.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale