legal news


Register | Forgot Password

M.S. v. Superior Court CA1/3
M.S. (Mother) and S.F. (Father) petition this court for extraordinary relief after the juvenile court terminated reunification services with their daughter, S.F. (Minor) and set a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Both parents contend the evidence does not support the trial court’s findings, and Father additionally contends the court failed to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. (ICWA); see also Welf & Inst. Code, § 224 et seq.) We conditionally grant Father’s petition as to his ICWA claim, and otherwise deny the petitions on the merits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale