P. v. Gonzalez CA3
Defendant Josue Gonzalez appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault with a deadly weapon other than a firearm, corporal injury on a spouse, and lesser-included simple assaults. Defendant contends the trial court prejudicially erred in failing to give a unanimity instruction as to the assault with a deadly weapon conviction, as there were at least two assaultive acts that could constitute the crime. The People claim the assaultive acts were committed as part of a continuous course of conduct and therefore a unanimity instruction was not required. We conclude any error was harmless.
Comments on P. v. Gonzalez CA3