legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.S. CA4/1
Julie E. Braden, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.
R.S. (Father) and his minor daughter, M.S., appeal from juvenile court orders denying Father’s petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 to grant him reunification services after his release from incarceration. Father also appeals from the juvenile court’s finding that the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) did not apply. The San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency) maintains the court did not err in denying the section 388 petition without a hearing or in finding ICWA inapplicable. We conclude the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by denying Father’s section 388 petition, but erred in finding ICWA did not apply, and conditionally reverse in part for ICWA compliance.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale