legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Shaw CA2/7
Irvin Randolph Shaw appeals from the superior court’s order denying his petition under Penal Code section 1170.95. In our prior opinion we affirmed the superior court’s ruling, after which Shaw successfully petitioned for review by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court transferred the case to us with directions to vacate our prior opinion and reconsider our decision in light of Senate Bill No. 775 (2020-2021 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2021, ch. 551, § 2) and People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952 (Lewis). The People now concede, and we agree, the superior court erred in summarily denying Shaw’s petition without appointing counsel and receiving briefing. Because we also agree with Shaw the error was not harmless, we vacate our prior opinion, reverse the superior court’s order denying Shaw’s petition, and direct the trial court to appoint counsel for Shaw, issue an order to show cause, and conduct further proceedings under section 1170.95, subdivision (d).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale