In re V.C. CA3
A.C., father of the minors V.C. and J.C. (father), appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating its jurisdiction over this dependency action and specifically objects to the visitation order. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 364.) Father contends the juvenile court improperly delegated its judicial authority to the minors as to whether any visitation would occur at all when it included language in the custody order that “visitation and contact is not to be forced.” We shall affirm.
Comments on In re V.C. CA3