legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.G.-C. CA4/2
K.G. (mother) appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to her now-ten-year-old daughter K.G.-C. (K. or child). She contends that the juvenile court erred by refusing to apply the parental-benefit exception to termination. She also contends that Children and Family Services (CFS) erroneously failed to comply with the inquiry requirements of state statutes implementing the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).
We will hold that the juvenile court properly found that the parental-benefit exception did not apply. However, CFS concedes that it failed to carry out its duty of inquiry. Accordingly, we will reverse, but only conditionally. If, after a proper inquiry, the juvenile court finds that ICWA does not apply, it must reinstate the order terminating parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale