P. v. Villanueva CA5
Armando Villanueva was convicted by jury of 10 counts of sexually abusing minor girls at a daycare operated by his wife. He raises a single issue on appeal: Did the trial court err in excluding evidence he was sexually interested in “adult Caucasian women, not children?”
We conclude the court did not err and, even had it erred, the error would be harmless based on other evidence presented indicating Villanueva was neither sexually deviant nor suggestive of pedophilia. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Villanueva CA5