legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.M. CA2/2
C.W. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order assuming jurisdiction over her son, C.M. (born Aug. 2015) and removing him from her care. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, 361.) She contends that (1) the jurisdictional findings are not supported by substantial evidence; and (2) the juvenile court’s removal order is not supported by substantial evidence.
Because the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings are supported by substantial evidence, we affirm. In light of C.M.’s return to mother’s custody, her challenge to the juvenile court’s removal order is moot.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale