In re R.S. CA2/6
M.L. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders terminating parental rights to her children, R.S., L.S., and R.L., (the children) and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) Mother contends the juvenile court erred in finding that the parental-benefit exception to adoption did not apply because the evidence demonstrated that the children would benefit from continuing the relationship and terminating parental rights would be detrimental to the children’s well-being. She contends that a legal guardianship or long-term foster care is the more appropriate permanent plan for the children. We affirm.
Comments on In re R.S. CA2/6