legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Pennewell CA1/4
Defendant Aileka Pennewell appeals a judgment revoking her probation and imposing a four-year prison sentence. Her court-appointed counsel has filed a brief seeking our independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Defendant has submitted a letter brief arguing that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the probation violation findings, (2) the prison term should be reversed because her felony conviction upon which it was based should have been reduced to a misdemeanor prior to the filing of the probation revocation petition, and (3) the court made unspecified errors in calculating her credits. Having reviewed the supplemental briefing and the record, we conclude no issue warrants further briefing. We have identified an error in the calculation of custody credits and with the Attorney General having no objection, we shall remand for the limited purpose of allowing the court to recalculate defendant’s custody credits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale