Evertz Technologies v. Cooper CA6
Evertz Technologies Ltd. and Evertz Microsystems, Ltd. appeals an order quashing service of summons in its suit against Nevada resident James Carl Cooper. The trial court granted Cooper’s motion to quash for lack of personal jurisdiction finding that Cooper was not subject to suit in California for the claims alleged against him. On appeal Evertz contends that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of either general or specific personal jurisdiction. Additionally, Evertz argues that the court should have compelled Cooper to provide further discovery before ruling on his motion to quash. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
Comments on Evertz Technologies v. Cooper CA6