legal news


Register | Forgot Password

J.N. v. R.H. CA1/5
This is an appeal from a three-year domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) entered against R.H. in favor of his spouse, J.N. R.H. argues his due process rights were violated because the trial court did not continue the hearing for a sufficient length of time to allow R.H. to retain counsel. R.H. also argues that the DVRO is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Finding no error, we affirm.
On January 21, 2021, J.N. filed a request for a DVRO against R.H. J.N. alleged a recent incident of abuse during which R.H. grabbed her arm while she was holding their young child. She also alleged multiple prior incidents of abuse beginning in 2016. On January 21, 2021, the trial court issued a temporary restraining order against R.H. and set a hearing for February 11, 2021. R.H. did not file a written response to the request, but he appeared at the February 11, 2021 hearing and requested a continuance in order to seek counsel.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale