P. v. Sengsongkham CA5
Defendant Leuth Sengsongkham previously appealed after he was convicted of murdering his wife and another man and was sentenced to 90 years to life in prison. On appeal, we remanded for the trial court to consider its newly granted discretion to strike the two 25-year-to-life firearm discharge enhancements pursuant to Senate Bill No. 620 (2017–2018 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 620) (Stats. 2017, ch. 682, § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 2018). On remand, the court declined to strike the enhancements.
Defendant appealed again, and his appointed counsel asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant did not respond. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Sengsongkham CA5