P. v. Thao CA3
Defendant Nue Daniel Thao appeals from his conviction for first degree murder after he shot and killed Jonathan Lee. Defendant contends the trial court instructed the jury with legally incorrect definitions of self-defense and involuntary manslaughter and violated his constitutional rights to due process and to be free from excessive fines by imposing various fees, fines, and assessments without first determining his ability to pay (see People v. Dueñas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157 (Dueñas)). Finding no error, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Thao CA3