legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jordynn W. CA2/7
The juvenile court sustained a dependency petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a), (b), (d) and (j), alleging Danielle W. and Juwan W., parents of now-five-year-old Jordynn W. and now-one-year-old M.W., had engaged in incidents of domestic violence in the children’s presence and were unable to provide proper care for the children due to their substance abuse and Danielle’s mental instability. The sustained petition also alleged Juwan had sexually abused Jordynn.
On appeal from the jurisdiction findings and disposition order removing the children from Danielle and Juwan’s custody, Danielle argues the grounding of dependency jurisdiction in part on the couple’s history of domestic violence was error.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale