legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.R. CA2/7
Casey T. and John R., parents of seven-year-old T.R., five-year-old L.R. and two-year-old John R. III, appeal the juvenile court’s order terminating their parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. The sole issue on appeal is whether the juvenile court and the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) complied with their duties of inquiry and notice under the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) (ICWA) and related California law. We agree with Casey and John that the Department failed to comply with its affirmative and continuing duty to inquire whether the children were Indian children and the juvenile court erred by failing to ensure an appropriate inquiry had been conducted. We further conclude the error was prejudicial.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale