legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.M. CA3
M.M. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying his request to change the court’s previous order terminating reunification services with Mi.M. (minor) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388), terminating his parental rights as to minor (§ 366.26), and freeing minor for adoption. Father argues the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying his section 388 request in light of the substantial change in his circumstances and resulting ability to safely care for minor. We discern no such abuse. Accordingly, we will affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale