legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Keenum CA3
In 1990, defendant Richard Lee Keenum pled no contest to violating Penal Code section 4573.6. He was originally granted probation but was then sentenced to prison for three years after violating probation.
Defendant filed a petition in July 2021 to dismiss the judgment pursuant to section 1203.4, and the trial court denied it in August 2021. Defendant appealed.
Defendant’s appointed counsel has asked this court to conduct an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale