Proper T View, Inc. v. Carstens
Defendant appeals from an order denying his request for relief from default, and from orders denying his several motions for reconsideration. Defendant asserts that the trial court had no choice but to grant the relief requested because he filed an attorney affidavit of fault under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b). He further claims that the default was entered too soon because the time for his response had not yet passed, that plaintiff Proper T View, Inc.'s (PTV) seeking entry of default immediately after service was completed mandates that the default be set aside, and that since only slight evidence is required to justify setting aside a default, the trial court erred. Court affirm.
Comments on Proper T View, Inc. v. Carstens