legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.C. CA4/2
At a disposition hearing, the juvenile court ordered that S.C. remain removed from the physical custody of her father, J.C. (Father). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 361, subd. (c)(1).) Father raises four issues on appeal. First, Father contends the jurisdictional findings against him lack substantial evidence to support the elements of causation and substantial risk of serious physical harm. (§ 300, subd. (b)(1).) Second, Father asserts the petition was facially deficient because it failed to allege a substantial risk of serious physical harm. (§ 300, subd. (b)(1).) Third, Father asserts the juvenile court erred by failing to state the facts supporting the order removing S.C. from his custody. (§ 361, subd. (e).) Fourth, Father asserts that a non-offending parent may appeal from a disposition order. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale