legal news


Register | Forgot Password

B.R. v. Superior Court CA4/3
Leslie A. Barry, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.
Petitioners, parents of minor B.D., challenge the trial court’s order terminating reunification services at the six-month review hearing in B.D.’s dependency matter. Petitioners argue substantial evidence did not support the trial court’s findings that returning B.D. to either petitioner’s care would create a substantial risk of detriment to B.D., and that there was no substantial probability that B.D. would be returned to either petitioner after the rendition of additional services. We conclude substantial evidence supports the trial court’s findings on both risk of detriment and probability of return as to both petitioners. Accordingly, we deny both petitions and their requests for a stay of the upcoming hearing on termination of parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale