legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Rodney S. CA1/4
Rodney S. appeals from an October 5, 2021 dispositional order declaring him a ward of the court and imposing various conditions of probation. He contends the probation condition prohibiting him from being present in a building that he knows contains firearms or weapons is invalid and must be modified. In a prior opinion challenging the same condition in a different wardship petition, this court held the condition was overbroad and required modification. (People v. R.S. (Apr. 5, 2019, A154336) [nonpub. opn.].) Contrary to Rodney’s contention, the law of the case doctrine is not applicable here. Although this is Rodney’s fourth appeal under the same juvenile court number, the prior appeals pertained to separate wardship petitions, each with different underlying offenses and dispositional orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale