legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.G. CA4/1
M.G. (Father) appeals from an order issued at the contested disposition hearing where the juvenile court denied his request for reunification services and found without prejudice that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) did not apply. Counsel for Father and the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency, together the parties) have conferred and agree that the Agency’s investigation under the ICWA was inadequate under the relevant statutory and decisional authority. The parties filed a joint stipulation seeking the issuance of an immediate remittitur. We accept the stipulation, conditionally reverse, and remand for compliance with the ICWA.
In July 2021, Father initially told a social worker that he had no Native American heritage but later disclosed possible Cherokee heritage in his maternal and paternal lineages. Mother, A.M., claimed possible Cherokee ancestry through the maternal great-great-grandmother.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale