In re L.C. CA4/2
In this dependency case, defendant and appellant B.C. (mother) appeals from an order terminating her parental rights over her child, L.C. She argues that the juvenile court should have instead applied the beneficial parent-child relationship exception and selected legal guardianship as the child’s permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) Mother further maintains that alleged father, T.R., was denied due process when he was not noticed of the dependency proceedings and the court failed to afford him the protections of the Servicemembers’ Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. § 3901 et seq.) (SCRA). Finding no error, we affirm.
Comments on In re L.C. CA4/2