P. v. Terrell CA5
Defendant Nolan Tanner Terrell contends on appeal that (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his Romero motion to dismiss a prior felony “strike” conviction within the meaning of the “Three Strikes” law (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)–(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)–(d)); and (2) his sentence on count 1 in case No. F19905005 must be vacated and his case remanded for resentencing in light of Senate Bill No. 567’s
(2021–2022 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 567) amendments to section 1170, subdivision (b). We vacate defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in light of amended section 1170, subdivision (b). In all other respects, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Terrell CA5