P. v. Bell CA5
Defendant and his codefendants robbed a casino and several of its patrons. Multiple codefendants used assault weapons, pointing them at patrons, employees and a security guard. Later, defendant and his codefendants conspired to rob the casino again but were caught and arrested. Defendant and his codefendants were convicted of well over a dozen crimes in connection with these incidents.
Defendant argues the trial court abused its discretion in declining to strike his prior serious felony enhancement. (Pen. Code, § 667, subd.(a).) We reject this contention and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Bell CA5