In re G.C. CA6
After a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court found G.C. committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute sending harmful matter to a minor, sexual battery, and false imprisonment. G.C. was adjudged a ward of the juvenile court.
G.C. raises four claims on appeal. First, he contends insufficient evidence rebutted the presumption he lacked capacity. Second, he contends the image he sent did not constitute “harmful matter” under Penal Code section 288.2. Third, he contends section 288.2 was not intended to target minors who engage in age-appropriate sexual contact. Fourth, he argues section 288.2 as applied to him violated his equal protection rights.
For the reasons below, we conclude these claims are without merit. We will affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re G.C. CA6