legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Philadelphia Reinsurance Corp. CA5
A surety appeals from a summary judgment entered on a bail bond and an order refusing to grant relief from its forfeiture, contending an emergency rule adopted by the Judicial Council in response to the COVID-19 pandemic tolled the appearance period for exonerating forfeited bail bonds and, therefore, the summary judgment was entered prematurely and is voidable. That rule tolled “the statutes of limitations and repose for civil causes of action.” (Cal. Rules of Court, Appendix I, Emergency rule 9 (Emergency Rule 9).) We conclude the appearance period is not a statute of limitations or repose and no tolling occurred.
We therefore affirm the summary judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale