P. v. Zambrana-Aleman CA1/4
A jury convicted defendant and appellant Dixon Zambrana-Aleman of child molestation and multiple related offenses. He contends the court violated Kelly-Frye when it admitted expert testimony about the Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS), and that the court erred when it allowed the expert to “vouch” for the victim’s credibility and denied his motion for new trial based on juror misconduct. Appellant’s arguments are meritless, so we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Zambrana-Aleman CA1/4