Eitani v. Simayof CA1/2
Defendants Adi Simayof (Simayof) and Sarit Simayof-Cohen (Cohen) appeal the trial court’s order entering judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 against each defendant, and various companies associated with defendants, based on written settlement agreements which Simayof and Cohen separately entered into with plaintiff Lisa Kroger Eitani. Defendants argue that the evidence presented to the trial court was insufficient to support entry of judgment against Simayof; that Cohen’s duty to pay money to Eitani pursuant to the settlement agreement never arose; that the settlement agreement between Eitani and Cohen was never intended to involve entry of judgment against Cohen; and, if entry of judgment against Cohen was proper, the trial court was required to reduce the amount of the judgment to reflect payments Simayof made to Eitani.
Comments on Eitani v. Simayof CA1/2